Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262115AbTKHTqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:46:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262119AbTKHTqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:46:20 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:34763 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262115AbTKHTqT (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:46:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 11:46:05 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ulrich Drepper cc: Anton Blanchard , Denis , Subject: Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness In-Reply-To: <3FAD418D.2080508@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 22 On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Of course it's supported. the clock_* functions are in librt. And they > are supported and, when working, greatly increase the usability. The > old user-level implementation is as good as we get it but really not up > to the job. Okey-dokey - I verified that the clock_nanosleep() function is also broken. I'll see if I can see what the mess is all about. That posix-timer "retry" code really is a pretty horrible thing. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/