Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:23:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word
Message-ID: <20180906132333.GG5360@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20180817070105.1725-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
 <20180904194944.19721-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
 <20180906110926.GF5360@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAAh8qsyMcL-acBf4nXq2RSE=Y43FMG8v+TuyvvmgGtkjHchAyQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2E/hm+v6kSLEYT3h"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAh8qsyMcL-acBf4nXq2RSE=Y43FMG8v+TuyvvmgGtkjHchAyQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--2E/hm+v6kSLEYT3h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:23:34PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> > it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it
> > much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads.

> Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement
> come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits?

Mail sorting.  It can mean that you get things like someone deleting a
thread and the new patch getting caught up in a thread delete command
and hence missed.

> Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need
> to somehow collect yet more reviews?

You should've got a mail at about the same time saying it's been
applied.

--2E/hm+v6kSLEYT3h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAluRKlQACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9CwRwf+N8tdfUCN4L8ZOFeE3umGG0yN6jbjo4GYV8NMZW0oC7F6Je7uDZTk3+zY
L7mXbYwxmkPfvAmayZVM7gv2E/jq2Mx0Vs2bIA9tjgO/WIMx0Y876rCY5QpVSTAg
yrmnMv4fzeQMBfosNg0SQCO6Cvf/l5EE/TwGbbAJknsOw+lCZXxL/NwOj007OaO9
ctHuFzs/IoF6qWUcNYKrIyjY+0erEUC19gB4h/U60JAPcDwWTBwuQMGIXeXdEjel
5Ix7NsflJl1oLuAPxpKyGWFv+1pOFJ+eUIb3R99pkJIOECItCn+WjuChBAFBzQs8
r4U+HcrZQLjxWqErKHi0PCKw74x62Q==
=Dq84
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2E/hm+v6kSLEYT3h--