Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:23:57 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Matt Hart <matthew.hart@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Widespread crashes in next-20180906
Message-ID: <20180906152357.GA13389@roeck-us.net>
References: <2e8e31f5-4db5-4907-2d09-f6444bc78ede@roeck-us.net>
 <20180906140413.GA5098@thunk.org>
 <CAH+k93Fgk2yZ3OzBOL2uxSVuOqEJB5wS1Zfny8bDkbuQ3sM6Jw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH+k93Fgk2yZ3OzBOL2uxSVuOqEJB5wS1Zfny8bDkbuQ3sM6Jw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Matt Hart wrote:
> On 6 September 2018 at 15:04, Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:45:15AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> Build results:
> >>       total: 134 pass: 133 fail: 1
> 
> Do you build arm64? Because KernelCI is seeing build failures in arm64
> defconfig for next-20180906
> Clearly it's a module build problem for sunxi but I'm not sure who to
> CC about this.
> 
I do, but as part of the boot tests, not as explicit build test,
to save a bit of time. Maybe I should run a build test as well.

> https://kernelci.org/build/next/branch/master/kernel/next-20180906/
> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20180906/arm64/defconfig/build.log
> 
> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_de_config"
> [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_set_hdmi_src"
> [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_of_table" [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko]
> undefined!

Same error here, in the boot tests. Sorry, there are just too many
failures there, and I didn't go through all the logs.

Do you have bisect results ? Otherwise I can run bisect later today;
that should hopefully identify the culprit.

Thanks,
Guenter