Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1140051imm; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:26:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaYSaPX9a+QRTcENU1wdvrxOHRw4XFMhLNIaSeqYQRNJR2jBYcDeK8Fd/nb7EHCj61K+Qh/ X-Received: by 2002:a62:1544:: with SMTP id 65-v6mr5460141pfv.178.1536276372263; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:26:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536276372; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vwkbgqQ9HwZIuje1agRwBbzK5aeY2KX6FQGSoLBVTdAhzPi+jNBO+pAu2tH4/hTUjE UGSXQxx7W/k6DNPmBe7Tpr/Cbt15kF4LAvV2S4D+wKAqmbC+0xRPbbDRpLBHrUj+MXBC UUn9cOlQ0vWB3JBygV0wWM4FnjiOyJFlBXOT373s6pqkUBFCVYLgDM4VI7AZtP0sp6BD jMd2rJjHFmK+0peGHfKiD1P6hRB6SekhwehMc3+z9duyyrCf3W0Ahvo79FQsNh8Y4iC4 AOOT7vexWXYg1oZpULnxhYE1mxGBKcyf3FsWPAeadKHXAG30bTKTk0JltX8+9Jxjb68i 2ckw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=8ZVI4pHsfxqrjBJKcqZAxC6Zl+zR+SRbki2sICEQnOw=; b=FUhly5ZaWaBRewTGngvzxfk95DQtn8hfpcKWu2xJeNqBCLF8T4oyZzc2QfofafMVpz KGLB00NhkTZ068tIaOlpkYAiokEr2ZsYm4kUYBdB9JsgliW40S3EZfWjDuIaSRnsSmfe GSHqWAj1LrvwYSsXu8/wXz48OGOsFqVcry4aT9uwnwLdxkIE0N+rQlSCZJdzI+8ct35o plhd7Pm4UkvUgwZ1j9jxVXCf0akRB9ajdsyGzCj+0Icf2+49Pg4bU7FB0W2L2VgkN8GC YvJWiFhuhUNW0XFXK7o4wgn70utNEd9pRl8UWY24NZcarj31AWmu5Ni5qiboKMcGbMvv 7MxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q8-v6si6086179pfh.353.2018.09.06.16.25.57; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727820AbeIGB3f convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:29:35 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:41739 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725819AbeIGB3f (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:29:35 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 6948F2072F; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:52:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from xps13 (unknown [91.224.148.103]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70924207B0; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:52:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:51:58 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Marcel Ziswiler , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Marcel Ziswiler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Brian Norris , Richard Weinberger , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: esmt: retrieve ecc requirements from 5th id byte Message-ID: <20180906225158.1a209c56@xps13> In-Reply-To: <20180906224422.4be710c8@bbrezillon> References: <20180906084922.14845-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> <20180906084922.14845-2-marcel@ziswiler.com> <20180906224422.4be710c8@bbrezillon> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcel, Boris Brezillon wrote on Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:44:22 +0200: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:49:22 +0200 > Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > > > From: Marcel Ziswiler > > > > This patch enables support to read the ECC level from the NAND flash > > using ESMT SLC NAND ID byte 5 information as documented e.g. in the > > following data sheet: > > > > https://www.esmt.com.tw/upload/pdf/ESMT/datasheets/F59L1G81LA(2Y).pdf > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..360d351ac043 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Toradex AG > > + * > > + * Author: Marcel Ziswiler > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > + > > +static void esmt_nand_decode_id(struct nand_chip *chip) > > +{ > > + nand_decode_ext_id(chip); > > + > > + /* Extract ECC requirements from 5th id byte. */ > > + if (chip->id.len >= 5 && nand_is_slc(chip)) { > > + chip->ecc_step_ds = 512; > > + switch (chip->id.data[4] & 0x3) { > > + case 0x0: > > + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 4; > > + break; > > + case 0x1: > > + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 2; > > + break; > > + case 0x2: > > + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 1; > > + break; > > + default: > > + WARN(1, "Could not get ECC info"); > > + chip->ecc_step_ds = 0; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static int esmt_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > > +{ > > + if (nand_is_slc(chip)) > > + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_SCAN2NDPAGE; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +const struct nand_manufacturer_ops esmt_nand_manuf_ops = { > > + .detect = esmt_nand_decode_id, > > + .init = esmt_nand_init, > > +}; > > Looks like you forgot to hook the new esmt_nand_manuf_ops to the ESMT > entry (in the nand_manufacturer table), so as is, the patch is not > exactly adding support for ECC req parsing ;-). I missed that. Will drop both patches from nand/next, waiting for a v2 (please also reorder the macros in patch 1 as suggested). Thanks, Miquèl