Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1685719imm; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 04:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdbe4kgdCDcG9J2xc4Z7NuTrww0UpLvUOGr69UkyvutIxQ4ZKh/E81z13lrswkEn2CUQbNIn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9302:: with SMTP id bc2-v6mr7645830plb.280.1536320291729; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 04:38:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536320291; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cNWrP+oPbPO4GbTbfB2bc6vTEEgA6/pf/+j7JbdOxu6P0IaZrp5h1QItQ2GBaUJ8am XOQgq6gt7L9Tz4DejUZfYRce8XapP3rSK6FLwEbyBhhI7mUSUuDpOLARGn5Sg9llmrzd eFarlQHkXFbelq2mANGJ+GNcALeQi6SYPK6v5v9FX9xOQX/naFr58onQ3+Q/ggqsN8Sg DXpvffLXwryIdVajxho+/Lbh1UIrwIjPlbxzZmVIAsKy267URETOE/cSHYl3zlZuoDoP xeCgKfdRh4znP80ByI6eFL6AcR/1lEg7g3WpWvOG58exaTOLys1UERac/df0lF4k3qe9 oLFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8zsiqZZuKf/PZE5K0WgzsuKWyyHdJTk9LuHOsGa0rhM=; b=0m4EEL+aiGi52tADmaOieVbVab47bnGCLQB1bmADsDECphvOAZ9hRykhLhAK3ed/xz 3oJKiboDbWc9leRJlPXc96ZdOQaYNZ+ebwsOQs9eDYR9jwE4pFmrZRzMpU8AoVnabapG u5sZdTztms1JKV8H44CWU1ZPhe316OuDY8TJssyTU/adjPSfzjm2ZV5WePH/PrOYnazQ zB6v0g+hkl01n/KryJSA1Y5F9EIsXrz+MTpGlcxKXAjRj5U6O1t50kxMtixJaff7mzcW YEVS9ZuK03n/KDl1f6/xEgSiTwODmo+UXzNo0Xl7xxfwi9rH3eBEifYA2mrJHbubCqpj R/Dw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b128-v6si8283243pfb.352.2018.09.07.04.37.55; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 04:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727328AbeIGNBs (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:01:48 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:35670 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725940AbeIGNBs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:01:48 -0400 Received: from p4fea45ac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.69.172] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fyC1d-0001Ww-Ax; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 10:21:57 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 10:21:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Yang, Bin" cc: "mingo@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "Gross, Mark" , "x86@kernel.org" , "Hansen, Dave" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm: optimize static_protection() by using overlap() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1534814186-37067-1-git-send-email-bin.yang@intel.com> <1534814186-37067-5-git-send-email-bin.yang@intel.com> <82fc8d80749f920c4a5107469924205d92037785.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, Yang, Bin wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 09:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, Yang, Bin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > I just write a test.c to compare the result between overlap() and > > > original within(). > > > > You are right. Your version of doing the overlap exclusive works. I misread > > the conditions. I still prefer doing inclusive checks because they are way > > more obvious. > > I am sorry for my poor english. What is "inclusive checks"? Exlusive: val >= start && val < end Inclusive: val >= start && val <= end So the difference is that you feed exclusive with: end = start + size and inclusive with end = start + size - 1 Thanks, tglx