Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1972653imm; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaIg9FIJDMTUQCCtNp2aAUpqGQDMlRtilRCH084a2LqdqIJdBmeBkG7Qtn2FejfozGqc3+A X-Received: by 2002:a63:444d:: with SMTP id t13-v6mr8870357pgk.102.1536335696660; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536335696; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Tsz3p6gMsCLwkAbjL2LDa+pZcjEeubZ6Xgc8iOfs0xZStTO6qtIQtqfp8iybhfTa7I AvaHt8GqX9dmDkn7bTukoY55wVVSU1uM7VZvOrbR+ACQf/4sCcrbWuDlWrrM9rg+/trI DqIQrCH533VO2NDkDif4jWeiv41Ud6ynMizdp0XglbYoe/46TMYf2RlWVmJI454FUiR/ zNxGr0HiB5baqOswWxnutLsIDyFu7IRumQZwOopKRo2t9zw4GauPARC2J5sRrbU7KS2D ajcnpBKS3UxHjFsZfF7M7YxcSb/0L4qKL+2GqCPiYKM//Wm91bp/uRXTSmMQ0h2/X7KI REpw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=LauoadOAIhIrUC5YZcJHX21MxI/Ye/Mk705vKy6fBw0=; b=nbf4OE4r1fZPZgWvUd1FsGdezicZjaMrfic4Kc30jACUouzMi5Xw8ce03G+6d+FE2b 6M/YmG/CEUISI/4yxxn94jatTIAya+RQldh1/qUIKUYkcsdhZPXHlxrdxToM2ry6A8UX KEvMa2SQn0BgJFKvrDossAuO70IUqpB+LWQGu/iUE3jROjCJoaOuI/Z2IOEQaT4nE5yO 9bPK3tDQ0lVZoaBFy31L0jkYJzRQOeXxo5M1bJm8uPrlCqdHuYzQQaXPOnDMwadWyac0 0vXe1/HwgqPZk8twRVc4AvF3x0L4F1rdZiC2MR9inPkTUhmm9zzaYjZDrvs53m4qR+Aq 2uDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EFObLetZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q90-v6si8456036pfa.272.2018.09.07.08.54.41; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EFObLetZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729325AbeIGUGa (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:06:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:34675 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728215AbeIGUGa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:06:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so12630822ljk.1; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LauoadOAIhIrUC5YZcJHX21MxI/Ye/Mk705vKy6fBw0=; b=EFObLetZP8icaiDvAVPaie/rZjnRUGJEhGc5j9+LAoC8G+78EHn2erwLtIDDOnYV4M SJWuZZcRr3jX5uVDH82tsCbSQcnNz2r3K2fWSCUSCHHKNN2Ir+laeqdIlBsqUm+FKQm9 5yKR6D79OJuS7muSfewbY8wfc7rgN5+WpZ6Im+MMCLOVYHkc0Z1+B/s28OQFYDopwlhc 0QZUR1irubaBils3saOBYWnPtUgGrOys85eurf/3fPmzENuJbmgEBiPydbxTdR5Yr4Nl qnrSjOAcm5hqTkYg3ibCouwAhTtUCC0iRb+eU4PuHQCPnHcEqL666LgoXl+B+jFVVZWb zeFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LauoadOAIhIrUC5YZcJHX21MxI/Ye/Mk705vKy6fBw0=; b=XWypiNmrIBADw/Cz29NadhLJ6aOhX811PA6E8sO46ByqfrRYYvRPDLz+PejFaAtTpI Ns9wtONeT8WODt8V7tSAK7kp3X2D55aeg8sskbjPHOa2JMMnkG6DEA8iINstC0knkMtw wsi4rsrp55EvlfQ/q8WF+DlcHTdsXP1vmCd+Ip637bDcYkDCdEdLJkzS0XB3ZRR8Ed8h p0Tvvwyjr/VJC+hq8NA84iZe7ckmbHQlwX7cMqCAAe6umUS422wPYMbFybZWVmQ7iwkr 5IKa25h5nY2nSmTE7TFGghOpwg/q8YE5tzVIXkoiUSL9FfR69gHon/I+CR10ToEV9mnl xiBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AsUPhHW5Lkx1/15TDpbQTBIDObXm6a74JPRlYTmsl7UJIwJO6P O8BrMFMYCW67TIO485PuQyLo9hCETm4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5d9d:: with SMTP id v29-v6mr5159913lje.137.1536333904913; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.160] (91-156-179-220.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [91.156.179.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r21-v6sm1358244ljb.16.2018.09.07.08.25.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: nes: add unlikely() to assert() To: Doug Ledford , Leon Romanovsky Cc: Faisal Latif , Igor Stoppa , Chien Tung , Roland Dreier , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180831192418.12346-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20180905060106.GI2977@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <811a6feca9fdea2db59ac392a4711cd897f46cc7.camel@redhat.com> From: Igor Stoppa Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 18:25:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <811a6feca9fdea2db59ac392a4711cd897f46cc7.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote: > This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I > acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it > didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since only one patch out of some > large number touched rdma files). Now it is being resent as not part of > a series, but my ack was preserved. Yes, apologies for the confusion (and maybe wrong process?). The patchset as a whole didn't seem to gain traction, so I decided to fallback to the more tedious process of submitting them individually. Since the specific patch was not altered, I assumed the ack was still valid - I am sorry if I did it wrongly -- igor