Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180907142247.2931-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180907142247.2931-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:49:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ0VZftZ+Qve+=91tbvgYof68NW+dBf4bPv+b8uQ0y1hg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Split up name & type in modalias generation
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:22 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> The kernel's vsnprintf() implementation discards all alpha-numeric
> characters following a %p conversion specifier. This is done in order to
> generically skip any of the various modifiers that the kernel supports.
> Unfortunately, the OF modalias is generated with a format string that
> violates the assumption made by vsnprintf():
>
>         of:N%pOFnT%s
>
> While processing the above format string, vsnprintf() will eat the 'T'
> character, assuming that it belongs to the preceeding %p specifier. This
> results in a modalias with an incompatible format, which in turn causes
> the automatic loading of drivers based on modalias to no longer work.
>
> To fix this, split up the generation of the name & type fields into two
> separate snprintf() calls to avoid confusing the parser.
>
> Fixes: 73813f8483b1 ("of: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name")
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Note that a more elegant fix would be to make the %p format specifier
> parser report back the exact number of characters consumed. I briefly
> tried to implement it, but quickly ran into numerous special cases
> that make this solution rather involved.
>
> I can spend some more time to improve this in general if that's what we
> ultimately want, but I think this patch is a better short-term fix to
> workaround the issue.

See my reply on the original patch. I've updated the patch in my
dt/next branch with the fix to use %c.

Rob