Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261151AbTKIWww (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:52:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261152AbTKIWww (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:52:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:38120 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261151AbTKIWwv (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:52:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:50:28 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Brownell Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , colin@colino.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem Message-ID: <20031109225027.GA2425@kroah.com> References: <3FAE77B7.8040901@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FAE77B7.8040901@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 721 Lines: 20 On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:21:59AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine > in a hardirq context. See this patch: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2 > > It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final. I've not planned to submit it for 2.6.0 as it's a relativly big change, and I don't have the hardware to test it out. Anyone have any other thoughts about this? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/