Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp762471imm;
        Sat, 8 Sep 2018 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYXkAgDtzaoEKjEinIMEB82VC6cWeh+FP8qjr0+o4M+AdNBZ84UVDYmiTnFlbnQNfQtJbYl
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1016:: with SMTP id y22-v6mr14422564pfi.109.1536420457626;
        Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536420457; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=fFByAN9uk6RMPpTM5zThS5DVVnmfkBDsqUU5PaJf9DxKkIGHWcaWuHZYAmu4WBel25
         dx8qW+tAtHr9C2JoXL7X1PSycdcz//AHrYsjeGr9VgNJ4XEkH/Qpp6PyVmzG0uyInN6u
         5qYPdqdw2TQaVVxVFPaWAgBlXD/Ex16IBV2bdwLALZBz0Hq0kzru314cnn/XPQAHNVGE
         s1hn62y6PKMCZEjqBbyYFobLAHzn71/SKsZkCK5xsZP3YIKWtFM61ZAvVkca4RS7mCBc
         xvPOk/zsTL8P1iIOJFoLwjATBRTHoiZE9Ftj0P1bhns6FiGr6AFz/wH7SdIh6QWNrhc7
         yjQA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:content-id:mime-version
         :subject:cc:to:references:in-reply-to:from:organization;
        bh=L+I3aeDgw2h5MLuoBULKZA7ZH071hTAlrp7zeYtuwh0=;
        b=mpEqe1cEbNvFL4TiGOwsENfJM7al9qrBN5wC5nnpldgZeMJ8Ho8PQytz8pA234asjF
         gTtItDjLCeAPak13zI5ZbZzHCG6dh7FIcJdKubQvqlu7VKuFi6v8OHY14D4dx9PwIuhe
         XhE5gjEIANEPtoY90elHsdDLzMkw5aRMKs7r2gzZgvwEevs2a9xdwvYdyvYq6865xNja
         Hlq0wwznEcaGajd5YMJsn3cjsUgsVScFdDVsxtFB3OMnbCHgEom1K6s9VvgvB5fz3t4V
         7UT1dkXo+ItfOh4zUcFplSOayHfPLPqCRbMuVNIxSrJnB9fwgx0OGV2bRpbY5q0V7dB0
         WeTw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10-v6si11579652pgh.310.2018.09.08.08.27.22;
        Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727638AbeIHUM0 (ORCPT <rfc822;chenc2371@gmail.com> + 99 others);
        Sat, 8 Sep 2018 16:12:26 -0400
Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:35816 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726877AbeIHUM0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 8 Sep 2018 16:12:26 -0400
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150AF40776DB;
        Sat,  8 Sep 2018 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-123-84.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.84])
        by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EB5104946D;
        Sat,  8 Sep 2018 15:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <25C89575-D4E9-48FB-BEC9-383B09F32E44@holtmann.org>
References: <25C89575-D4E9-48FB-BEC9-383B09F32E44@holtmann.org> <153618445730.7946.10001472635835806478.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809061007140.23269@namei.org>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] KEYS: Support TPM-wrapped key and crypto ops
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <12100.1536420374.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 08 Sep 2018 16:26:14 +0100
Message-ID: <12101.1536420374@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.3' DOMAIN:'int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'dhowells@redhat.com' RCPT:''
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:

> so I have reviewed and tested this code. In addition, we have test cases for
> it in ELL (embedded linux library).

I wonder if there's any practical way to add a test for this to the keyutils
test suite.  I'm guessing it's quite tricky, given the extra bits you need to
emulate the TPM.

David