Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2544783imm; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYqeMO66LZwY5Uq/VESTadLNnioi1kYX0kkxCP1AyNomnLF1T+wdKIBmAF27hFv7obovxmP X-Received: by 2002:a63:7353:: with SMTP id d19-v6mr21488491pgn.281.1536573124330; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536573124; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j5z9ibrU+7waROIPZ9H29yeWQ95uMKHmePSOrBVyAdriqRYtK7B4kRRTc7cU3ruKX1 iFwrRQDH8wT2GZUwGUaqof94aRFKLnj8VInJJXbmCCDZA8v0km6wgZGEamk/XqEpOfxv SvszcNsVdfAggOK3fHN1HMaGxdXrN272xufZHR197yVc7I6Dv2vrePcmu/maoQ6kaPwr DlzBZx3VqdsQRPq09ubjvEIO+DYudsfaqDlwNeLF/sOlzBIcpf93CIrjgx1n/v/vKF6T FSwLBxNOXxVfAMY1KtVix5k7P88TotywJo+6WduhDtob5+c1QJU9BROLUHqzWEPbfZDz JPuQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=oO9fr622UIBEZPZxNxCGY2mygoxZn/6rRDuWTMJB11E=; b=q5GTzVXDqpLcC8ZyaIi7lwrDpI/HFZpb7TpMYtAemA70cSTf96EhkBBHJz1xjmcQ+L 804LgOvv7uk8g5k0BVf5VF0AYv2fg9Qi+xe/cdDZgiS4aHQ+xK+d9EvRjE+LsN8wtJbX x87+VUC7IRer28+D+u/y4zAhgr+utetazehXJzr4QXSCEDFK+zY/aCAzNATteeZghlhk kgf+eCRojlIJsQ7bWkW0qXpQ00KVYtT/nxeH/zMrwt7d9LzyeBIo3PUGe78Rn5QaJGOb lI9LsMkePR+yCSkU0aD9kbXChgLHy9RQy2JzHNBDcHhVxex4kY+6xXAX+Olmos4+QGP/ dqgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i1-v6si16870012pgm.671.2018.09.10.02.51.49; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728063AbeIJOns (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:43:48 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:60535 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727261AbeIJOns (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:43:48 -0400 X-UUID: 4e2a515c2b764d2eac1bc721134295e6-20180910 Received: from mtkcas09.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.178)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1567075511; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:29 +0800 Received: from mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.126) by mtkmbs08n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:27 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.17.3.153) by mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:26 +0800 From: To: , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: mediatek: fixup mtk_pcie_find_port logical Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:20 +0800 Message-ID: <1536573023-6720-2-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.4 In-Reply-To: <1536573023-6720-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> References: <1536573023-6720-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Honghui Zhang The Mediatek's host controller has two slots, each with it's own control registers. The host driver need to identify which slot was connected in order to access the device's configuration space. There's problem for current host driver to find out which slot was connected to for a given EP device. Assuming each slot have connect with one EP device as below: host bridge bus 0 --> __________|_______ | | | | slot 0 slot 1 bus 1 -->| bus 2 --> | | | EP 0 EP 1 During PCI enumeration, system software will scan all the PCI device starting from devfn 0. So it will get the proper port for slot0 and slot1 device when using PCI_SLOT(devfn) for match. But it will get the wrong slot for EP1: The devfn will be start from 0 when scanning EP1 behind slot1, it will get port0 since the PCI_SLOT(EP1) is match for port0's slot value. So the host driver should not using EP's devfn but the slot's devfn(the slot which EP was connected to) for match. This patch fix the mtk_pcie_find_port's logical by using the slot's devfn for match. Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang Acked-by: Ryder Lee --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c index 861dda6..20b9088 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c @@ -337,11 +337,26 @@ static struct mtk_pcie_port *mtk_pcie_find_port(struct pci_bus *bus, { struct mtk_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; struct mtk_pcie_port *port; + struct pci_dev *dev; + struct pci_bus *pbus; - list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) - if (port->slot == PCI_SLOT(devfn)) + list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) { + if (!bus->number && port->slot == PCI_SLOT(devfn)) return port; + if (bus->number) { + pbus = bus; + + while (pbus->number) { + dev = pbus->self; + pbus = dev->bus; + } + + if (port->slot == PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn)) + return port; + } + } + return NULL; } -- 2.6.4