Message-Id: <200311101629.hAAGTAwi002657@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any thoughts when 2.6.0-test10 is due? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:56:39 GMT."
             <5.2.0.9.0.20031110095312.00b3dea0@mailhost.ivimey.org> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20031110095312.00b3dea0@mailhost.ivimey.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1623194150P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:29:10 -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1208
Lines: 32

--==_Exmh_-1623194150P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:56:39 GMT, Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org>  said:
> ... It's been a couple of weeks since -test9 came out, and I'd quite like 
> to get a kernel that includes the various good patches that have been 
> proposed since then.

Make note that a lot of the more intrusive patches will be deferred to 2.6.1,
which will have a patch easily 10x the size of the -test[789] ones (Linus
is being intentionally very picky about what goes into the tree).  I'm
going to predict that the 2.6.0->2.6.1 patch will be well over a megabyte
even after gzipping.

--==_Exmh_-1623194150P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE/r7zWcC3lWbTT17ARAtvgAKCU+yrNiQIjDDgQ1M7Yc1dRv1ty3ACgxdLI
TAOylORu4UE6flw04VM0em0=
=yKQv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1623194150P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/