Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264045AbTKJS1g (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:27:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264057AbTKJS1f (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:27:35 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:7052 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264045AbTKJS1d (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:27:33 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air In-Reply-To: <3FAFD1E5.5070309@zytor.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 51 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>The best way to fix this isn't to add locking to rsync, but to add two > >>files inside or outside the tree, each one is a sequence number, so you > >>fetch file1 first, then you rsync and you fetch file2, then you compare > >>them. If they're the same, your rsync copy is coherent. It's the same > >>locking we introduced with vgettimeofday. > >> > >>Ideally rsync could learn to check the sequence numbers by itself but I > >>don't mind a bit of scripting outside of rsync. > > > > Wouldn't a simpler "stop-rsync -> update-root -> start-rsync" work? If > > you'll hit an update you will get a error from your local rsync, that will > > let you know to retry the operation. > > Part of the problem is that there are multiple steps in the rsync chain, > some of which can't be stopped in this way. > > The sequence number idea looks sensible to me. Larry, would it be too > much work to have the cvs repository generator generate these files? So the update of the rsync repo should do something like: update file1 update repo update file2 Isn't it? I do not understand how this guarantee coherency: Kernel.org Me get file1 (old value) update file1 get repo-file1 (old value) update repo-file1 ... update repo-fileJ ... get repo-fileJ (new value) update repo-fileN get file2 (old value) update file2 - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/