Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:29:24 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver
Message-ID: <20180910132924.GA6987@infradead.org>
References: <20180906123651.28500-1-anup@brainfault.org>
 <20180906123651.28500-4-anup@brainfault.org>
 <20180906140628.GA10580@infradead.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809081241310.1402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809081241310.1402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 12:46:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > Just as before:  NAK to entirely pointless abstractions.  Please stop
> > beating the dead horse.
> 
> I disagree. These interrupts very well fit into the percpu interupt
> mechanics and that allows them to be handled by all the generic mechanisms
> as any other interrupt.

Just a few weeks ago you said the contrary:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2018-August/000943.html