Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:37:31 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
cc:     Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller
 Driver
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809101533330.1292@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809101536410.1292@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180906123651.28500-1-anup@brainfault.org> <20180906123651.28500-4-anup@brainfault.org> <20180906140628.GA10580@infradead.org> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809081241310.1402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20180910132924.GA6987@infradead.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809101533330.1292@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 12:46:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Just as before:  NAK to entirely pointless abstractions.  Please stop
> > > > beating the dead horse.
> > > 
> > > I disagree. These interrupts very well fit into the percpu interupt
> > > mechanics and that allows them to be handled by all the generic mechanisms
> > > as any other interrupt.
> > 
> > Just a few weeks ago you said the contrary:
> > 
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2018-August/000943.html
> 
> Sigh. Yes. Now that you remind me. 

Just for clarification. I had the impression that Anup was trying to wire
up more than just the timer interrupt, but that doesn't seem to be the
case.