Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264027AbTKJSh4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:37:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264056AbTKJSh4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:37:56 -0500 Received: from JJ-POSTDOC.MIT.EDU ([18.19.0.210]:53150 "EHLO marbles.mit.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264027AbTKJShx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:37:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:37:49 -0500 From: David Roundy To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air Message-ID: <20031110183749.GB15667@jdj5.mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <3FAFD1E5.5070309@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Uptime: 13:29:16 up 60 days, 22:13, 29 users, load average: 8.28, 3.73, 1.57 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 887 Lines: 32 On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:27:33AM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > So the update of the rsync repo should do something like: > > update file1 > update repo > update file2 > > Isn't it? I do not understand how this guarantee coherency: > > Kernel.org Me > get file1 (old value) > update file1 get repo-file1 (old value) > update repo-file1 > ... > update repo-fileJ > ... get repo-fileJ (new value) > update repo-fileN get file2 (old value) > update file2 The kernel.org side goes update file2 update repo update file1 -- David Roundy http://civet.berkeley.edu/droundy/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/