Received: by 2002:a4a:3008:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id q8-v6csp3677974oof; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZprqpKOVK8YmAs9+IJrv0G7utYcouBkyEZJe6eE6nFUMQkkVKblYlLRvbQfOCjfck5sZTb X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b60e:: with SMTP id b14-v6mr24758660pls.111.1536632832527; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536632832; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1LlvJ6hPOAzCNW5jZLTn5VxU7UkfAksq+LP8ilozhIpSm6/KYbprAxuDhKVGR68kAH 0pAeW+kSKRsm4sfoF+ZaHukDcZmbu/RsrSYVprnIEqv83qSDs8Z4wIdq7P/x/HR0z9up x4dgz+iii3I+3TsQ86rtl6d070+onYNYcqqxz2mjRqnVvUgsmh/cpEXotv7JQwsfyOQt KdTcOj57VsevMuy6rFntuOe6XDVCvER1yNxcTR+Asc/s5Sw81c/CSTSKbzv9DLTSUwhT PycI/b91WVpHCA+LP+SDmJaUfVYrYvoxU2fOW8HGRPc9ly2SGLa4y/SMwEwrgGDg/+EK /OXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=h/LJBy5I6ul5F2PHpIUIcayUCUG6S2NKPe15mxtyPJk=; b=dZ5PwWwrDKweOmRVVullRzBloBcwoBS96uw2NANcWzCEg/rIkmTe9bV8udgFN8aERa eqvmDRfDoI7eAz/H9dYSZ6LI0C41eKpfr3HfOy22VkgSbvEsmwz1191EXHhKu4lsNy0U ERjP1DnW76JKHKmQcljB6dzD0Gjk0qxWTeCkQLfAqEjQ8s6yQBDmD8wpBF5of0giNiUm /HEB6bgiw2K4OvoVr02f6cSXF8iB2rJmElZVK+Gd3HRvF1Cbxmbih9qmFs0tzWZdY/0O V9kdq1cPKMzsEL1+fYB0VPV2rod3W97K9jDXKwqEoHBiPKibIhBclSWDZbUkrR6FEsg6 /3qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x1-v6si17646162plv.26.2018.09.10.19.26.56; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726481AbeIKHXp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:23:45 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:56919 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726264AbeIKHXp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:23:45 -0400 X-UUID: 407df65b70c246b1b1b910a4a890025b-20180911 Received: from mtkcas07.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.84)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 2023885710; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:26:36 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by mtkmbs03n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:26:33 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:26:32 +0800 Message-ID: <1536632792.22101.7.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: mediatek: Register i2c adapter driver earlier From: Jun Gao To: Wolfram Sang CC: , , , , Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:26:32 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20180906183144.GD8607@kunai> References: <1536239729-10008-1-git-send-email-jun.gao@mediatek.com> <1536239729-10008-2-git-send-email-jun.gao@mediatek.com> <20180906183144.GD8607@kunai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 20:31 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:15:28PM +0800, Jun Gao wrote: > > From: Jun Gao > > > > In order not to block the initializations of some i2c devices. > > Register i2c adapter driver at appropriate time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jun Gao > > The reasons this patch was rejected in v2 still hold. OK. Thanks for your opinion. >