Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263340AbTKKEdY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:33:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264195AbTKKEdY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:33:24 -0500 Received: from nat-68-172-17-106.ne.rr.com ([68.172.17.106]:40182 "EHLO trip.jpj.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263340AbTKKEdX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:33:23 -0500 Subject: Re: I/O issues, iowait problems, 2.4 v 2.6 From: Paul Venezia To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031110202819.7e7433a8.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1068519213.22809.81.camel@soul.jpj.net> <20031110195433.4331b75e.akpm@osdl.org> <1068523328.25805.97.camel@soul.jpj.net> <20031110202819.7e7433a8.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1068524553.22809.108.camel@soul.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 10 Nov 2003 23:22:33 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1566 Lines: 37 > > Well that's nice and simple. Could you please run `vmstat 1' during that > big `dd'? Wait for everything to achieve steady state, send us twenty > lines of the vmstat trace? I'd pulled this before, here's the output. > > > > I'd done bonnie++ i/o tests already, and except for an apparent NPTL issue on the per char, > > the block i/o numbers were fine; no abnormal results whatsoever. In fact, block r/w > > numbers were improved compared to 2.4.22. Now that I'm looking for it, however, I > > do note extremely elevated iowait numbers during a bonnie++ run. Something in the MPT > > modules? > > Greater than 90% I/O wait is to be expected in these tests. What is of > interest is the overall bandwidth.2.5 megabytes per second is very broken. Definitely. I should have noted that the 2.4.22 tests on that dd came back in 23.607s, the 2.6.0 tests hadn't returned for over 4 minutes. > 2.5 megabytes per second is very > broken. I have a 53c1030 box here which uses the MPT fusion driver and it > happily does 50MB/sec to a single disk, but I guess that's a different > setup. This is a 53C1030 with a RAID1 mirror. Now that I think about it, I did the >2GB bonnie tests on a single disk, no mirror. I'll rerun the i/o tests with this setup and then remove the mirror and see what happens. -Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/