Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp4312227imm; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYd9qAcQ9A7+QsZ8fcjyQI35UIKETzGe/obsxa/C2sa6XmwHtPCnIfhPxMboNUaiio13T1/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:706:: with SMTP id 6-v6mr28819253pgh.137.1536685099826; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536685099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wCTnfZHB6MkK2GEinVp8NptWZmYd1vR+9/RZmKzNp2rdD759A87UeGDwfjr7jUuz1v RZ0R1GOK6DdTrK71hZiO6wVqBZvLjO1JNMpLet9BbjKRmyouq7qHXAZyOWS75nu8ifew BEwm+6BlJOkkok4WkDMmtE7n+xGgHCQyvqHt+tTseJFKpS5/nwtJcoyUWrG9jicODxSM PpDJmxQIiNjyZZ8iFnRiMAq7048KkkU11jAgc1WFcVa77nFt0WcRURP3pN20APaxuVdx gwYQemXy3Mk3mm7e44bOeCP7vTeNwMzcYEnTeagOe70JnmDAMx2Jl/W6FuhP7w77z6sy duHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=65wejLMaMjGMA6IMHqN02QnP21aAyUVe17gMHGFm90I=; b=0j15F7qiGw1xD4UdrnGEfMgw/mU7OingnekBnb5ejqwoS77BMv3Rno4ePc/QuEyqOU 2xWNjhbi7ftCG3WPmpFpl92tMvtJv01D7rdPece6YsWNe3o52Xzrrijz4HQWSUm8sRKZ bY6rdZlUj1QXQc9tdZupiseSDU3FeWgTTtlilKwNnNkWpxkeZlMDZsh+ZRSzOUzI9JH4 ekml2EOLULjedH3zZw5ys8kQ7dPJvKA+xe9P3V2697vuCXtTpyHpsULxnMMPPYoG64p7 55EzvdPa8PStj9DtDCjvm59zUdMVYz0xXO7gO4nzwbLz0G0+iw/L2XZuKPyDaf8ZEM7t b0hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 93-v6si20889694plf.113.2018.09.11.09.58.04; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727881AbeIKV6B (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:58:01 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:52688 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726989AbeIKV6A (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:58:00 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C63240216EB; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com (segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com [10.19.60.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E822ED144; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Jeff Moyer To: Jens Axboe Cc: Takashi Iwai , Paolo Valente , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] bfq probe failed on 4.19-rc3 References: <8b5a7dc9-2dc1-16ee-4b05-a72eb6680c77@kernel.dk> <8d5f3ab2-50e8-226c-8ccb-c722872910db@kernel.dk> X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean? Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:57:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8d5f3ab2-50e8-226c-8ccb-c722872910db@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:54:19 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'jmoyer@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe writes: >> And then there were 4... > > Exactly. I'd bump it to 5 to leave room for one more, if we have to grow it > again, probably worth it to make it dynamic. So for, not really needed. Takashi, > can verify that the below fixes it up for you? > You can slap a Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer on that when you commit it. Cheers, Jeff > > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > index c19f9078da1e..c630e02836a8 100644 > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > @@ -1510,8 +1510,10 @@ int blkcg_policy_register(struct blkcg_policy *pol) > for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) > if (!blkcg_policy[i]) > break; > - if (i >= BLKCG_MAX_POLS) > + if (i >= BLKCG_MAX_POLS) { > + pr_warn("blkcg_policy_register: BLKCG_MAX_POLS too small\n"); > goto err_unlock; > + } > > /* Make sure cpd/pd_alloc_fn and cpd/pd_free_fn in pairs */ > if ((!pol->cpd_alloc_fn ^ !pol->cpd_free_fn) || > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h > index d6869e0e2b64..6980014357d4 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct blk_stat_callback; > * Maximum number of blkcg policies allowed to be registered concurrently. > * Defined here to simplify include dependency. > */ > -#define BLKCG_MAX_POLS 3 > +#define BLKCG_MAX_POLS 5 > > typedef void (rq_end_io_fn)(struct request *, blk_status_t);