Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp4334293imm; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbMMdgqTOLKEo6UfrcI7zlaWYKM1rd8lrpP1wt0C6i2Allz/LJ2GXUqRzFm28vTvNwNDYf3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:70cc:: with SMTP id l12-v6mr28370583plt.132.1536686172811; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536686172; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P5ol6lImVKEMgXD/A6kDQdd8OhGpDjwgGHQGfo5/TlV8L6pbWlYb7AGt597JvnyF55 1ZZQ2tYRh2i8MFb3WxAQge+TFcsx/SCM0W5yjvghN5z4LBOauUiam3YU+HEZdKFSOeFI 72AF5+afUbLcGJpZufONqUi7S/ZcOhWT0Ex3Xjt7C4i+wfDL9E1xvvYUDkTd2C1w9dh6 Fzj3fjjFR0w3KsNMn/cMS93ZfMAbwesJAUAme7sFWVm9yjPIbETT8EcLTildRovzPKKt v0GrMGgMZ1PhaUXkgsQwr/jZD+9p94JR0dmsK6jhMKEfgPSgeSeDgCt1TBe4kM5S0i9V S6QQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Bp5WFqrdKxoYMrT8ya7yXPuL/cGxX15SDh3/D01rLY0=; b=J7YP5pVR4BCPU8EuCXDbniCYwdFbLviqW3jFQcGxbXe33GiyaFHEEtOSS9NRGpRDQa QAZx9e6og/dOMkEDfiKsTNHoCNAryJ7MHCEwZSwBTe5fiORejGpB8m8Jw9koKKbny121 /guJxhpf6WDl/EuXlE7tX2ap78hed/WzaO1JZf/Df/A2fpqQwLVEGsf7/MdFdQdp6ION wqV/OfhaH/OIhIgFp1gutrM5x+Iw343zD7TrscHwG5lYQhxGo3+kWXMeO6LTdTYQTrXB SnKRA0Q3ViTjhzkrzApMKaF4D/y8rL4mVa/UexGUk/KTID0smiffGTIG9xfTLLhlgipt yu4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b34-v6si19664592pld.394.2018.09.11.10.15.57; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728287AbeIKWPP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:15:15 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:31116 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728235AbeIKWPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:15:14 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2018 10:14:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,361,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="79642205" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2018 10:14:57 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [PATCH V3 1/6] perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:14:32 -0700 Message-Id: <6486385d1f30336e9973b24c8c65f5079543d3d3.1536685533.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It is possible that a failure can occur during the scheduling of a pinned event. The initial portion of perf_event_read_local() contains the various error checks an event should pass before it can be considered valid. Ensure that the potential scheduling failure of a pinned event is checked for and have a credible error. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180807093615.GY2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- kernel/events/core.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 2a62b96600ad..191c0c2e10de 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -3940,6 +3940,12 @@ int perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event, u64 *value, goto out; } + /* If this is a pinned event it must be running on this CPU */ + if (event->attr.pinned && event->oncpu != smp_processor_id()) { + ret = -EBUSY; + goto out; + } + /* * If the event is currently on this CPU, its either a per-task event, * or local to this CPU. Furthermore it means its ACTIVE (otherwise -- 2.17.0