Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        robh@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
        arm@kernel.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] dts: tc2: Update coresight bindings for hardware
 ports
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
References: <1536661032-30481-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <1536661032-30481-12-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <20180911170113.GA27663@e107155-lin>
 <fbde78a0-6487-7bdb-d02b-4fbf556f536e@arm.com>
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Organization: ARM
Message-ID: <9cf11b0c-b5c0-b39d-8c57-ad7aea5c6212@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:23:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fbde78a0-6487-7bdb-d02b-4fbf556f536e@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 11/09/18 18:15, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 09/11/2018 06:01 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Switch to the new coresight bindings
>>>
>>
>> I still see the below warnings:
>>
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb: Warning (graph_child_address):
>>     /replicator/in-ports: graph node has single child node 'port@0',
>>     #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb: Warning (graph_child_address):
>>     /funnel@20040000/out-ports: graph node has single child node
>> 'port@0',
>>     #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>>
>> I need the below patch to fix them, let me know if it looks OK, I can
>> amend and apply.
> 
> Thanks for reporting. I purposefully added the "address-cells" and
> followed the format everywhere in the series thinking that, that is
> indeed the formal way of doing it, rather than having implicit port
> numbers. I can send an updated series fixing it everywhere.
> 
No need to post the update for TC2 unless it's different from what I
have proposed.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep