Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:34:13 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     mchehab@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EDAC polling
Message-ID: <20180912083413.GB12551@zn.tnic>
References: <ed6869d5d90e03c52ad2b8577f7f5772@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ed6869d5d90e03c52ad2b8577f7f5772@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 06:09:01AM -0700, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> May I know why client edev_ctl->poll_msec settings is not considered?

Looks like it has been like this since it was added. But, I take patches :)

Make sure to sanity-check ->poll_msec too, before accepting it. I.e.,
something like < 1sec doesn't make sense, for example.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.