Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:01:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:01:01 -0500 Received: from dfmail.f-secure.com ([194.252.6.39]:28690 "HELO dfmail.f-secure.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:00:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:09:23 +0200 (MET DST) From: Szabolcs Szakacsits To: Alan Cox cc: Guest section DW , Stephen Clouse , Rik van Riel , "Patrick O'Rourke" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > I'd like to have it there as an option. As to the default - You > would have to see how much applications assume they can overcommit > and rely on it. You might find you need a few Gbytes of swap just to > boot Seems a bit exaggeration ;) Here are numbers, http://lists.openresources.com/NetBSD/tech-userlevel/msg00722.html 6-50% more VM and the performance hit also isn't so bad as it's thought (Eduardo Horvath sent a non-overcommit patch for Linux about one year ago). Szaka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/