Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp5400700imm; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZ+HS//1/RoXZ9URlszCjvqbBwkd0/ePkyNFZ72t5ne8ErLjEARe8v554VskcVVnj24/veH X-Received: by 2002:aa7:83cd:: with SMTP id j13-v6mr2113655pfn.236.1536755886256; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536755886; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q9+7VZVmBmNLXcP/0fvUGbI3GEEkMK8TnZMDLktvMh/UA8UqetZE9Od34LRhnEeIVO 4s31FCsFdYJeyxD6Yo6b0WlpVX7b1shxt62RF4GwKEm+TC9H0agQLx/VQXYE2LnYD6d4 5z5wooVUTE0StY9SvMfoWW9qge8X9FyuwZI+Akzaj84SbdhTRLPtD+tNbKnePGejogC+ AIYESONB4SWJyXIfslXFw+y4zaFuu3sJ4+KtJ6OCrk9HZvuKYRoYtzqJfUUg3Aag0kzO qyNBKX6d3QLph8ErOtiy2mzhZXPecdnRT70fYKkXJPUidoFFH3ZIlPqdL8cgnpNXPuAA 5HxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=8mLNUsuw+hjZTwllMYB6PAb9f9mea2AdZ1R5z6nRmrc=; b=0MlpRS1pPRQt3R97EqJ0prHDRx3KemDi5GmeCRrIZMzkBTvU64qYEIzW3jS9zh/uVR 2UlFTbrweMrYlpwGtORXVI9R+79k3BvRDM/qR5C5yVw0RFGWm8ZfSz3cFGpR3OyZuDtM Vev957zgrW/14Nj94IBKFCT4mFV/YqGlb6Bpy+su44iTwsjpqacqoBwaDVxAULkOYMsf lO0ZuZgVjKMPmhiGMpkx8FfKXYJCOrHAnRd/FS3StA2nhxQr/2jWPATeAIZl/ItlwWcR uGA9lqVkTITCOAf27c/ILJwOfPTnj074AHRJEF1y1mJg3usmPkppgoQIhhwfp9FpvjrG IJcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d19-v6si988143pgk.92.2018.09.12.05.37.50; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727332AbeILRl5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:41:57 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58680 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726672AbeILRl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:41:57 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA3180D; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 05:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.4.13.23] (en101.Emea.Arm.com [10.4.13.23]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 433F33F703; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 05:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/27] arm64: cpufeature: Use alternatives for VHE cpu_enable To: James Morse , Julien Thierry , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com References: <1535471497-38854-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> <1535471497-38854-3-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> <1d425320-aed3-b949-1ec5-f378248aac4d@arm.com> From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: <2e46f172-9d1c-6daf-f4bd-1bfd20dc5702@arm.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:37:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d425320-aed3-b949-1ec5-f378248aac4d@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/18 11:28, James Morse wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On 28/08/18 16:51, Julien Thierry wrote: >> The cpu_enable callback for VHE feature requires all alternatives to have >> been applied. This prevents applying VHE alternative separately from the >> rest. >> >> Use an alternative depending on VHE feature to know whether VHE >> alternatives have already been applied. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >> index 1e433ac..3bc1c8b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >> @@ -1022,8 +1024,15 @@ static void cpu_copy_el2regs(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) >> * that, freshly-onlined CPUs will set tpidr_el2, so we don't need to >> * do anything here. >> */ >> - if (!alternatives_applied) >> - write_sysreg(read_sysreg(tpidr_el1), tpidr_el2); >> + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( >> + "mrs %0, tpidr_el1\n" >> + "msr tpidr_el2, %0", >> + "nop\n" >> + "nop", >> + ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN) >> + : "+r" (tmp) >> + : >> + : "memory"); >> } >> #endif > > Catalin's preference was to keep this all in C: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10007977/ > , for which we need to know if 'the' alternative has been applied. > > I suspect there may be more registers in this list if we have to switch to > another EL2 register using alternatives. (but I don't have an example). > > Could we make 'alternatives_applied' a macro that takes the cap as an argument? Another crude way of doing this would be, take the action in the matches() of a boot capability, when scope contains SCOPE_BOOT_CPU (to make sure that we don't do this always for other "matches()" call backs via "this_cpu_has_cap()") and get rid of this "enable()". But that looks more hackish. Suzuki