Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp5902800imm; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:57:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda2g2nvKCedGBzo5HbaPaCdQ40WOEGnTJyj8ub43qIEHm+D5kfsTazTAIYWssYyi/TT9yC9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d808:: with SMTP id a8-v6mr4025726plz.68.1536782254497; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:57:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536782254; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VhsgmlkVb5Tp7Xs+SMNOJlrbwH6zfU41+G8ex3p8b8SZ3aVnrI0o+JDPGz4jHhhwME QYiqNfzKrvZRzSIdWKBrA47rIbJUgK8ulIVW+If2a4glTQ2VVxjktuxWkoUBA3nWzYq6 VA1celzPb5zNyx71qjuYaztJCeRS8eWRjQZZo2YLRvHbFftJ55Rk3M5I2KY1ybZBXASm HfB+4JQ4/CuBaSZgMZTvM9zAcLkdaYfmicWJYeXXyIKpJT0e50RVih0RFif3OGXg7bKJ GsXiD0mJDq92BCQDgo4j7uDjW8FTtRLiHqZdT/dy/ie2Hgsz92i8D3YJ3oZO4RC7BHvh FxVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=XvN9sVvu8KOHiuWK85ZK17X+bx48+U0oK5ZM1DaJScs=; b=RFdmSieCcunwJbVRm3Lhg71jCLDBPlO3/sm8P3piJaLcxqs2o+ZfzWyffEQoMK8W/s cOobxAmNFwWYn4y7IEQ1l+Bik9gGuSZ9yctRN7h02HURsU0zex0xWXYC+xxikdw3k+Tn c/SunzxgTzyquAjquO+2D999ZFyzWrj2mKSzeL2TtYhTRv6gKTV329Qurq33vO1S24z8 Tnq2PtuB+HoIdUY76PQsm2/FL1s3+Sos/35Qz9JrmyZ7wswTc0CV/MFdSY37IkAh4jAY MvLhfKKfdqH+r5tGqJWM4f7Z46OAk4pHr7zEtNPOEkAkz1eShKomfENhlPnZjJ4tzmQw JchA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d19-v6si2046514pgk.92.2018.09.12.12.57.18; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726830AbeIMBDR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:03:17 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:5529 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726069AbeIMBDR (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:03:17 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2018 12:57:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,366,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="72462161" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2018 12:55:27 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [PATCH V4 4/6] x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:54:28 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <060c5fa0a1f227e6119841b3b617c3f0cc9d5da1.1536685533.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> References: <060c5fa0a1f227e6119841b3b617c3f0cc9d5da1.1536685533.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A perf event has many attributes that are maintained in a separate structure that should be provided when a new perf_event is created. In preparation for the transition to perf_events the required attribute structures are created for all the events that may be used in the measurements. Most attributes for all the events are identical. The actual configuration, what specifies what needs to be measured, is what will be different between the events used. This configuration needs to be done with X86_CONFIG that cannot be used as part of the designated initializers used here, this will be introduced later. Although they do look identical at this time the attribute structures needs to be maintained separately since a perf_event will maintain a pointer to its unique attributes. In support of patch testing the new structs are given the unused attribute until their use in later patches. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- V4: The kbuild test robot reported a build issue that at first seems to be related to "make ARCH=i386" but was actually a result of the kernel configuration used not having CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS set. The consequence was that include/linux/perf_event.h was not being included via the tracing code (from include/trace/define_trace.h) and we thus encounter the build failure where struct perf_event_attr is unknown. Fix this by explicitly including perf_event.h arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c index 8ad83eb3fc89..33d7968f152a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -915,6 +916,31 @@ static int measure_cycles_lat_fn(void *_plr) return 0; } +/* + * Create a perf_event_attr for the hit and miss perf events that will + * be used during the performance measurement. A perf_event maintains + * a pointer to its perf_event_attr so a unique attribute structure is + * created for each perf_event. + * + * The actual configuration of the event is set right before use in order + * to use the X86_CONFIG macro. + */ +static struct perf_event_attr __attribute__((unused)) perf_miss_attr = { + .type = PERF_TYPE_RAW, + .size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr), + .pinned = 1, + .disabled = 0, + .exclude_user = 1, +}; + +static struct perf_event_attr __attribute__((unused)) perf_hit_attr = { + .type = PERF_TYPE_RAW, + .size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr), + .pinned = 1, + .disabled = 0, + .exclude_user = 1, +}; + static int measure_cycles_perf_fn(void *_plr) { unsigned long long l3_hits = 0, l3_miss = 0; -- 2.17.0