Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E53756053B
Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:33:56 -0600
From:   Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc:     Raju P L S S S N <rplsssn@codeaurora.org>, andy.gross@linaro.org,
        david.brown@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sboyd@kernel.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: write PDC data
Message-ID: <20180912223356.GA11079@codeaurora.org>
References: <1532685889-31345-1-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org>
 <1532685889-31345-6-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org>
 <20180912222809.GK22824@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180912222809.GK22824@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 12 2018 at 16:28 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:34:48PM +0530, Raju P L S S S N wrote:
>> From: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> The Power Domain Controller can be programmed to wakeup the RSC and
>> setup the resources back in the active state, before the processor is
>> woken up by a timer interrupt. The wakeup value from the timer hardware
>> can be copied to the PDC which has its own timer and is in an always-on
>> power domain. Programming the wakeup value is done through a separate
>> register on the RSC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Raju P.L.S.S.S.N <rplsssn@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>    - Remove unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> ---
>
>> +int rpmh_rsc_write_pdc_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	void __iomem *addr = drv->base + RSC_PDC_DRV_DATA;
>> +
>> +	if (!msg || !msg->cmds || msg->num_cmds != RSC_PDC_DATA_SIZE)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>
>Is it really always exactly 2 (RSC_PDC_DATA_SIZE) commands?
>
Yes, always.