Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp408270imm; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:40:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYeAA/vXGwHLNi69Ra/PjJNYmm7e7FgDcim5vTSPudTCyuNk8atd4ks4o//yLaP7QN5ybQJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:543:: with SMTP id 61-v6mr6274852plf.126.1536828058649; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:40:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536828058; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c6fslNvaQDNLpRrsMGFpUG046fL/EMbrJeLiiE0pQS4iEvG9pR/Zgd/thNXovWI/5j R1nNNGWPBFFl4/EcdsxXPNjhBIYHUHq4uxAESCuXLuSw2c6/oug8PXOLI+U7m2A28OIS Ae/g2NWxgrimXq8suRwspmEp1OfQDd6Egymz+5gowwQrYaMkqfpCl673Ftxk/CVhS8Vc TXRp2nNqBguTP78ydcfaIV94d3FPGKiogzhDjEOOMImtMbdjqvbhUdUDsgXWZzJIe0eS C7XEWfCLKSfKe5r0Caco6FMIU0SvD4wzHDGfAXcNsv+aB9xFDNX0AAqztephtNgrcjP9 xQgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=9TpSOOMLt+emc8Exs/lfwtNlOAvXIbBEvyHWn38ohNg=; b=gR5UOxqMaUs0gOLw1z2eqr51WLl8gndoMuWNy4Nzu37PnDdumrwLcT2MKf9ii9tOUb AG7GOjUDEhG0aUgpEo1Idg2+yvdl4rYGNQrHnIVm2mvKZ3EQ7XCqUi/0KJ706nKitoGW AEkbIeOJ4G8r+xBOxTU1jkTE7Vv7ElDYlXXRytu1PzTNNbxQQ0jXRq+1lren160xZb4F /7Bk56rk4KNnQRLKXZo74lkmvx0158Bw0cSBwGSzTHADV3ejw3e+QyNG7gTx6bUWwmYa 4yBMOPfh5TIuJSWnDAD0Bj8RAtJMLudUYuuU9zt+S+BKt3364BnEDIRP7Ks/iYIp8kAQ KbeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k20-v6si3715199pgg.7.2018.09.13.01.40.43; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728020AbeIMNsl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:48:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50374 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726308AbeIMNsl (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:48:41 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0CAF09; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:40:11 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Prakash Sangappa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] VA to numa node information Message-ID: <20180913084011.GC20287@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1536783844-4145-1-git-send-email-prakash.sangappa@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1536783844-4145-1-git-send-email-prakash.sangappa@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 12-09-18 13:23:58, Prakash Sangappa wrote: > For analysis purpose it is useful to have numa node information > corresponding mapped virtual address ranges of a process. Currently, > the file /proc//numa_maps provides list of numa nodes from where pages > are allocated per VMA of a process. This is not useful if an user needs to > determine which numa node the mapped pages are allocated from for a > particular address range. It would have helped if the numa node information > presented in /proc//numa_maps was broken down by VA ranges showing the > exact numa node from where the pages have been allocated. > > The format of /proc//numa_maps file content is dependent on > /proc//maps file content as mentioned in the manpage. i.e one line > entry for every VMA corresponding to entries in /proc//maps file. > Therefore changing the output of /proc//numa_maps may not be possible. > > This patch set introduces the file /proc//numa_vamaps which > will provide proper break down of VA ranges by numa node id from where the > mapped pages are allocated. For Address ranges not having any pages mapped, > a '-' is printed instead of numa node id. > > Includes support to lseek, allowing seeking to a specific process Virtual > address(VA) starting from where the address range to numa node information > can to be read from this file. > > The new file /proc//numa_vamaps will be governed by ptrace access > mode PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS. > > See following for previous discussion about this proposal > > https://marc.info/?t=152524073400001&r=1&w=2 It would be really great to give a short summary of the previous discussion. E.g. why do we need a proc interface in the first place when we already have an API to query for the information you are proposing to export [1] [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180503085741.GD4535@dhcp22.suse.cz -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs