Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp440303imm; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbttPCBJx0/PuXC+vWEoMJ5BXkVui0sawzbNgmTCmbrF6HsqBlmOlN5tmgwjnFq11jvO0aS X-Received: by 2002:a63:bc0a:: with SMTP id q10-v6mr6222178pge.60.1536830193785; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:16:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536830193; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QAAh33fHJNUWJAY2oZfD5x2Qy8aQ6BRQn9E8sKxMiiPkgaaW13dl3+GnbFRtc9Mf2R BpQkFINAEu2flhU1iMAc5dQRrXxpAeWKdy1ohri2jnSNXJSZFhCI2nlumEHXed/aYmCj KRc1/DFSpRu3hVsGnCFpVCK+M/WkhNgf+pAFA6A+vIXDSlz3/M3Rd53/Pal14HFcqBF4 UILIts2gMKQS7nJZSdk97kIuAQbJMmFmblw5m/L8Ua+Y6IfQbcXzQIbsghNkdkZlLhB9 TGwqU3vWKL6/VwzV77ezFPdyHO1wM5q+Own/PpsJVWAjWJ9Dm28Rf/670zFqoIeLVQTS dsjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=KIH9F8euSMpoqc0yOmAq9OdIGbmLi4QnMN8kOk0Z5BQ=; b=vrLbbxpUC5Dsp17jlsXrpghoVIcoAWaLSb1LkDVDf72IiOxicrymQmsrIw0hU1XsR1 TiUvFUKCuHaYtn1W4uP3CsIukQE5n1HNUHs8NCeAoKheIstENhxCrHzqeFOTdbgpEs9x 1NEPb4A26zOm44MT4EO8ImJbfUCCKtzUoUBHTYW3c3VYgmlDKpQKumCzJwJPWYuOGKgw QKXrZQyP3TGTR9Fm/opoVEVvx3QIU+SKbeppyQpg5TN3aEjaL9JEjGiqa8VDMffNL92f QORymYUMRAReaK5/5eZmIRJo3Sy/pdlqdsDmBI4z+1gUHeFk7NjIBaM+h+UNktOzCiBI 66ZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q66-v6si3612878pfk.268.2018.09.13.02.16.18; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727869AbeIMOYO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:24:14 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43720 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726832AbeIMOYO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:24:14 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3A718A; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com (e107981-ln.emea.arm.com [10.4.13.117]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCAD53F575; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:15:34 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Jingoo Han , Joao Pinto , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: dwc: fix scheduling while atomic issues Message-ID: <20180913091534.GB32721@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180829110408.556c3622@xhacker.debian> <20180910165722.38218779@xhacker.debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180910165722.38218779@xhacker.debian> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:57:22PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:04:08 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > When programming inbound/outbound atu, we call usleep_range() after > > each checking PCIE_ATU_ENABLE bit. Unfortunately, the atu programming > > can be called in atomic context: > > > > inbound atu programming could be called through > > pci_epc_write_header() > > =>dw_pcie_ep_write_header() > > =>dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() > > > > outbound atu programming could be called through > > pci_bus_read_config_dword() > > =>dw_pcie_rd_conf() > > =>dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() > > > > Fix this issue by calling mdelay() instead. > > Any comments about this patch? > > Thanks, > Jisheng > > > > > Fixes: f8aed6ec624f ("PCI: dwc: designware: Add EP mode support") > > Fixes: d8bbeb39fbf3 ("PCI: designware: Wait for iATU enable") Can you split it into two patches and repost it please ? It will make everyone's life easier to backport it if there is need, I will apply then. Thanks, Lorenzo > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel > > --- > > > > since v2: > > - Add Fixes tag > > - Add Gustavo's Ack > > > > since v1: > > - use mdelay() instead of udelay() to avoid __bad_udelay() > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +-- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > index 778c4f76a884..2153956a0b20 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > > return; > > > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > > } > > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > } > > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, > > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > > return; > > > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > > } > > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > } > > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > > return 0; > > > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > > } > > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar, > > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > > return 0; > > > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > > } > > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > index 96126fd8403c..9f1a5e399b70 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ > > > > /* Parameters for the waiting for iATU enabled routine */ > > #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES 5 > > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN 9000 > > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX 10000 > > +#define LINK_WAIT_IATU 9 > > > > /* Synopsys-specific PCIe configuration registers */ > > #define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710 >