Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261552AbTKLDwl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:52:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261555AbTKLDwl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:52:41 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:32198 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261552AbTKLDwj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3FB1AE78.2050304@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:52:24 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kirk bae CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So, Poll is not scalable... what to do? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 435 Lines: 14 kirk bae wrote: > If poll is not scalable, which method should I use when writing > multithreaded socket server? > > What is the most efficient model to use? epoll, thread pools, AIO... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/