Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1203310imm; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZF3DSigsUrizOhULfbCmXUsRLAz4h5AfIz+licsd6QEdjSdFuj/cK3uq1h0flDz6r67JvA X-Received: by 2002:a63:4425:: with SMTP id r37-v6mr8700911pga.391.1536874072890; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536874072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=om9mXbGDqC5fm0KARphsnjrJYGX7sYhUhIVigQf2DTgS4/gdcBohb4C2xPQtTK9gYh oH/wXe0A0mG4NvEudqkOKkXYDFAFd0j5xhqit9Ld4/9/0fyIqVXObu+wcezfsxgw9sOX fjy+V2oJuz+fsaIoJaJEKDBVqLLnlc/fuWBGnqxaVP/04plIc2Y3U01Xb6uQD++UeGeg B+TemAQbLKLB/s0RtiHUjZSaPuYEnChSLXrfVZoh1PmALjvpWsEaI+wvhGlunNmlSyR5 qfiEd+pyn855PmxJVdfBx2Ct8zGvo4mD9MnELN90fBzra6OYMDqemTPmB6bRKyCKnOim hrqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=p+tdWCD3+qCv3ttWpFfo/4tC6Elg4VqkvmXH9UYiS/E=; b=A5sg6k28jOXA1x9LJ7lsHkQ7f/ejqGCJr4MFLWfRDxuTI0CryKSDC2FIamMOz/zr0n NR2Qq4xJH45ekLc2SeiDZg2h4BaDJAJ1HN5bPL2D/Xb99X0Zzg39HLSALUmF/LzzpIo6 OpAe66DnUIXYv3Ds07KrCHlb4ryknVS5aXzABm+18XHRSvL3FGxu5ahXS/nuAJws8Xfw E8yev858F1+INcid1mF9I1sWD9E/d+SeoOlRmOc/36Av6cMgv3X6X5xiFcnQw+SP/oTJ EQXo0rby5fyhqfIJ5Ll081SsTy1AdHp9Fjf1es5rx3b3EbNV5UMcBiIJyo2b4/Q7XJN3 SQJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=gHVt+pAO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t32-v6si5028782pgl.484.2018.09.13.14.27.36; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=gHVt+pAO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728084AbeINCiW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:38:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59024 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727728AbeINCiV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:38:21 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com (mail-qk1-f181.google.com [209.85.222.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C99820881; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 21:27:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1536874025; bh=p+tdWCD3+qCv3ttWpFfo/4tC6Elg4VqkvmXH9UYiS/E=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=gHVt+pAOo1iLrEMPsZDfH8RuSYH5q355+X8fQrvIpIXoG2joNpfFSMhZXGvjwuRqn f1rMn0DqAOvTZm45dT5KbIMj7yO0ID6p5PPkVZ/7TuCAZ43UJyyu5tXGzI5pu0G3od l1ojm1GN4e0boHnjgOFM+WDlzjb5SlzhAOYyHhqY= Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id z125-v6so4054759qkb.12; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AMlme5Fu/xuTvxzhLKT6z7IwNpfvxcC+RTKM/x+qOcCWn3INUX Q+o3ARjfWgIeun7w4cH83pVs5qL1iapGtbrCpg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:bec4:: with SMTP id o187-v6mr6427539qkf.326.1536874024761; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:27:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180828154433.5693-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180828154433.5693-7-robh@kernel.org> <20180912121705.010a999d@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:26:53 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name To: Joe Perches Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Arkver , Steve Longerbeam , Philipp Zabel , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Media Mailing List , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 15:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > A problem with MAINTAINERS is there is no way to tell who applies > > patches for a given path vs. anyone else listed. > > try the --scm option That kind of helps if the maintainer has listed a tree, but gives wrong results if not. And you still have to figure out who owns which tree. That's not hard, but it's not scriptable. IMO, we should reserve 'M:' for maintainers with trees and use 'R:' driver maintainers. That's redefining M as "maintainer" rather than "mail patches to". You could still have both for a entry so you can know who to go bug when your patch hasn't been applied. Rob