Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 13 Sep 2018 23:15:47 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] UAPI: Check headers by compiling all together as C++
Message-ID: <20180913221546.GV19965@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20180905185922.GA25461@avx2>
 <20180905192636.GA13608@kroah.com>
 <20180905193111.GA27217@avx2>
 <20180905222247.GT19965@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20180913220124.GA12570@avx2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180913220124.GA12570@avx2>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:01:24AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Don't tempt me...
> 
> <= g++-8 doesn't support C99 style initializers.
> g++-8 mostly does: for example
> 
> 	.foo = {
> 		[BAR] = 1,
> 	},
> 
> doesn't work, but regular .foo = 42 does.
> Additionally, g++ makes noise about order of initializators.
> C++20 is supposed to make things better.

	It's too early for AFD postings.  And you *are* tempting
me to throw into the tree as many anti-C++ devices as can be
done tastefully, just to stop somebody attempting that insanity
in the earnest.