Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180913140149.3c39485c@mschwideX1> <CA+55aFxYR__1rfT--Vxkoh1RyA+g6pQs87H8tk7ajXW9L8p7tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180914073756.2c208e55@mschwideX1>
In-Reply-To: <20180914073756.2c208e55@mschwideX1>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:42:13 -1000
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyrGaCMJ1HHODieMZCBrNTrPWiQkR9kPgAjaW4cPfNVAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 4.19 #3
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:38 PM Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I did push it to keys.gnupg.net, but the sub-key is brand new and
> probably takes some time to sync on the key server network.

That's probably it.

> The key is there on pgp.mit.edu this morning, it that to one you
> are using or do you prefer a different one?

That's the one my laptop is set up to use (I'm on the road right now),
but it didn't receive when I tried it earlier. It's probably a pool of
servers, not a single one, and it just hadn't percolated to them all.
It came in fine now when I tried as a result of this reply, and so now
the signature verifies just fine.

Thanks,

            Linus