Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262078AbTKLPBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:01:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262101AbTKLPBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:01:39 -0500 Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:49851 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262078AbTKLPBe (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:01:34 -0500 To: jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Some thoughts about stable kernel development References: <20031110133536.GA1780@ncsu.edu> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: 12 Nov 2003 15:43:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031110133536.GA1780@ncsu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 10 jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu writes: > However, I am not convinced that it is true. I do not believe that people > who care about stability want to upgrade to a new kernel with major changes > in it every 9 months. Not sure what do you mean, but I was writing about time between _minor_ versions - for example, between 2.4.22 and 2.4.23. -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/