Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262186AbTKLPIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:08:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262202AbTKLPHo (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:07:44 -0500 Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:14783 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262186AbTKLPHi (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:07:38 -0500 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Some thoughts about stable kernel development References: <200311091905.hA9J5BiA004728@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: 12 Nov 2003 16:05:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200311091905.hA9J5BiA004728@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 590 Lines: 10 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes: > Two kernels getting different patches... (consider the case of a security > patch that hits code that was already hit by a previous -preN-ony patch, > so two different diffs are needed for the two trees) Yes, this is theoretically possible. Do you think it would be a frequent case? -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/