Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        sean@poorly.run, Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
        max.krummenacher@toradex.com,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/bridge: add bus flag support
Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:35:42 +0300
Message-ID: <4703489.BS6gAglWfc@avalon>
Organization: Ideas on Board Oy
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZdxLMkECq8BBJHDqKszHPMt2uUPFbwbPVNKXyxu-SWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180912183222.25414-1-stefan@agner.ch> <CACRpkdZdxLMkECq8BBJHDqKszHPMt2uUPFbwbPVNKXyxu-SWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Friday, 14 September 2018 12:07:03 EEST Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:32 PM Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:
> > @Linus Walleij, Laurent Pinchart: Since you have been involved in
> > the initial bus timings discussion, I would like to have your Ack
> > on at least patch 2/3... If we want to keep the setup/hold timings,
> > the patchset should also work without those two patches.
> 
> AFAICT this ends up with the PL111 code identical to what I
> proposed in my first patch set to support the latching properly,
> so I am pretty much happy as long as my hardware does not
> flicker. (Rough consensus and running code.) I'm not very invested
> in either idea to represent these timings, so
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I've just replied to patch 3/8 with an explanation of why we have added this 
particular API, and why we need to keep it.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart