Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:18:14 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        SE Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] LSM: Blob sharing support for S.A.R.A and
 LandLock
In-Reply-To: <5b983bba-049c-795a-3354-a2e8ab33cecf@schaufler-ca.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809150417550.18430@namei.org>
References: <cbf848ae-a1ac-c5ab-f23b-bc9217fceebe@schaufler-ca.com> <99cb1ae7-8881-eb9a-a8cb-a787abe454e1@schaufler-ca.com> <CAGXu5jLONSfPHYYYTLSma-+arVHSQKaEWb9JxpOn6TNKtyLNhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHC9VhQN0wq0zZS5BYU9jBomaWvCaJ_BqJjHF3AT7FG8Z0nLDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5jJs6kmd6Tjgwqb2Zx7e-jNbHqfJ57poZuyz4Qj=AKVfmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHC9VhQ20tBAMwOJ9mg0tBHYUoxjh0Szr3d62HuPw2SyT4XDLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGXu5jKec1JTsoqwKGThcJoamdL618AHu4jfFbqqQiauz1kjyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHC9VhQwT4d3wC37cVrrX-hZq1L3e6=TEAse4m-YH9SiFnkieA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5jLapViSK-j08Tq8cCZodiZXFsXze71xFPg6MQhDWDHDAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGXu5j+j47FH5RF2vrJh95=YFX76oSBFo8O6GZqa0utcfE1AVA@mail.gmail.com> <d1d12866-d557-8c15-6506-a54b9d927952@schaufler-ca.com> <CAGXu5jJG=wk6e_RU=KYDY48kOc=RmL3OB79T+rHqCyzaDSn=zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5b983bba-049c-795a-3354-a2e8ab33cecf@schaufler-ca.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> On 9/13/2018 4:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/13/2018 4:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> - what order should any stacking happen? Makefile? security=?
> >> Makefile by default.
> > Okay, if ordering is by Makefile and everyone dislikes my
> > $lsm.enabled=0/1 thing, then these mean the same thing:
> >
> > security=selinux,tomoyo
> > security=tomoyo,selinux
> >
> > i.e. order of security= is _ignored_ in favor of the Makefile ordering.
> 
> No, I think that the two lines above should have a different
> execution order. If we really need to specify multiple modules
> at boot time that is what makes the most sense.

Agreed.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>