Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261670AbTKLWfh (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261680AbTKLWfh (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0500 Received: from [217.73.128.98] ([217.73.128.98]:11397 "EHLO linuxhacker.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261670AbTKLWfg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:35:30 +0200 Message-Id: <200311122235.hACMZUDT017881@car.linuxhacker.ru> From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: reiserfs 3.6 problem with test9 To: rouquier.p@wanadoo.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87smkt63xu.wl@drakkar.ibe.miee.ru> <1068663075.17051.12.camel@Genesyme> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 26 Hello! Philippe wrote: P> Note: I kept the original reiserfs partition with the errors. So if P> someone needs any log to figure out where the problem comes from I have P> everything at hand. I'm also willing to perform other tests. Errors you've shown from your log suggest that somehow garbage appeared in some blocks that were supposed to be reiserfs metadata blocks. How this happened is unclear. Also lots of people (including myself) use reiserfs on a daily basis with high loads (and on latest 2.6.0-test kernels, too) and have not seen anything like that so either there is something wrong with memory or with writing to your disk, I think. Of course I might be wrong. There are disk testing programs out there (sorry forgot the names) (not badblocks) that put a lot of load on disk and see how it does. May be you want to try one of those too. Bye, Oleg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/