Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:21:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:20:57 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:4113 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:20:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init To: szaka@f-secure.com (Szabolcs Szakacsits) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:21:07 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), dwguest@win.tue.nl (Guest section DW), stephenc@theiqgroup.com (Stephen Clouse), riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), orourke@missioncriticallinux.com (Patrick O'Rourke), linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Szabolcs Szakacsits" at Mar 23, 2001 10:09:23 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > and rely on it. You might find you need a few Gbytes of swap just to > > boot > > Seems a bit exaggeration ;) Here are numbers, NetBSD is if I remember rightly still using a.out library styles. > 6-50% more VM and the performance hit also isn't so bad as it's thought > (Eduardo Horvath sent a non-overcommit patch for Linux about one year > ago). The Linux performance hit would be so close to zero you shouldnt be able to measure it - or it was in 1.2 anyway - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/