Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2858114imm; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 04:43:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdak5WGCZXQjQae1QEhOTZU8jk8zDVd4vp3A69bwjKV+u8yXunrkNl2jYc5Xcq4d6yAXTQ+Z X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b947:: with SMTP id h7-v6mr20732109pls.157.1537098216478; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 04:43:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537098216; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e9ldLMQX5b1Bwd5HLzE+7H8K5n32fXLLALT9230WppVltMnb7YmC2Xe7h3gaYBNpOz BIBjrm4IVTOMCMWAr5VKX1OTUjef/06jVH3juIbe/PpeQ8dymxI9ZLxqB3NH6bENAiZl vJssgbziPwQ8bSbx1nnY9n5oGTAWU6sgIe3Gh553hAC4AZjCRtN28HH57Sw+RvXBha3v u4/gL/ZAs1hwYHSYylJv6i0QN8IfdxbRYD+fsVDqM/cyYKZy3fhhS9AQv0dI1TFbJ+pZ P5zw/QIRroE1yJEn+MSS+VYmmwE44/LDOcIIrsE4DQGKtJIwefNP8g4z7N8TAKmtBSPU ICNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=bqRBViPq3SD7CvsG5PxBu+eYltGCft5I4ffiF0e6/B4=; b=nxiKqrm2k/YKjw2VicUTMJNLBkE0EEFaLXwCTVfle2xhYuugWh0HTeregwwuAXTpiK CTnY1U4JTylHbwP4COdOGXHy93S0OMY1deQfOJpf2FL1XXG1osCI76iKLdrf0tR9H/zU cDHK13xkWjiotavHtrkNnnZxJMp1vu7OOKD2hsjrDrKM+7/hvJWdZTJQU7Ul70+Fcf6w MTzLhyxBDLtxo522EDeLINz0MoNCZZrcYJbcdqjDmF2sSViO2FeFEQbkToy2SYcLHsi5 8tmDUhBkX1NuRpawj1X9VuOCTqccsdwpMTcdAiCQJHxYVeUuxPLr4k+V76wi43PPaP4d d2pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj4-v6si12205661plb.119.2018.09.16.04.43.21; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 04:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728212AbeIPRFv (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 13:05:51 -0400 Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.117]:58154 "EHLO emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726859AbeIPRFv (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 13:05:51 -0400 Received: from ydin.reaktio.net (reaktio.net [85.76.255.15]) by emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3432DB01AE; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 14:43:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: by ydin.reaktio.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EF30036C0F6; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 14:43:06 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 14:43:06 +0300 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Jan Beulich , Govinda Tatti , Juergen Gross , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, roger.pau@citrix.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] Xen/PCIback: Implement PCI flr/slot/bus reset with 'reset' SysFS attribute Message-ID: <20180916114306.GF18222@reaktio.net> References: <20171207222145.9769-1-Govinda.Tatti@Oracle.COM> <20171207222145.9769-3-Govinda.Tatti@Oracle.COM> <5A2A6AB10200007800195D4F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <8a3bc517-1255-4547-d244-5c400e44cc77@Oracle.COM> <5A377E020200007800197FFA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <559ffd12-b541-8a69-60bd-fbe10e3dc159@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <559ffd12-b541-8a69-60bd-fbe10e3dc159@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote: > >>>>> +static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev) > >>>>> +{ > >>>>> + struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data; > >>>>> + bool slot = false, bus = false; > >>>>> + struct pcistub_args arg = {}; > >>>>> + > >>>>> + if (!dev) > >>>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>>> + > >>>>> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "[%s]\n", __func__); > >>>>> + > >>>>> + /* First check and try FLR */ > >>>>> + if (pcie_has_flr(dev)) { > >>>>> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "resetting %s device using FLR\n", > >>>>> + pci_name(dev)); > >>>>> + pcie_flr(dev); > >>>> The lack of error check here puzzled me, but I see the function > >>>> indeed returns void right now. I think the prereq patch should > >>>> change this along with exporting the function - you really don't > >>>> want the device to be handed to a guest when the FLR timed > >>>> out. > >>> We will change pcie_flr() to return error code. I will make this change > >>> in the next version of this patch. > >> I exchanged some emails with Bjorn/Christoph and it looks like Christoph > >> as some planto restructure pcie flr specific functions but I don't know > >> the exact time-frame. For now,I am planning to use existing pcie_flr() > >> after checking FLR capability. We will switchto revised pcie_flr() once > >> it is available. > >> > >> I hope you are fine with this approach. Please let me know. Thanks. > > I've seen that other discussion. I don't think the change here > > should be done prior to the error reporting being put in place, > > for security reasons. But in the end it'll be Konrad as the > > maintainer to judge. > > > > Or wait, looks like there's some confusion in ./MAINTAINERS: > > Konrad is listed as maintainer for "XEN PCI SUBSYSTEM", but the > > list of files doesn't include pciback. So it would instead be Boris > > or J?rgen to give you a final word. > > > This is now 4.16 material so we can at least wait until closer to > opening of the merge window when we may have the PCI updates. (And I > just noticed that you responded to Christoph.) > > Besides, we don't want to make kernel changes until the interface is > settled (i.e the toolstack changes are accepted). > It seems Govinda's email address is giving an error, so I assume someone else needs to pick up this pciback 'reset' feature. Is it likely someone else from Oracle can/will pick up and refresh this patch, with the review comments addressed? Meanwhile the pcie_has_flr() has been exported in upstream Linux kernel, so that's already available for use now. "PCI: Export pcie_has_flr()": https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2d2917f7747805a1f4188672f308d82a8ba01700 > -boris > Thanks, -- Pasi