Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263953AbTKMLNH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:13:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263956AbTKMLNH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:13:07 -0500 Received: from webhosting.rdsbv.ro ([213.157.185.164]:3989 "EHLO hosting.rdsbv.ro") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263953AbTKMLNE (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:13:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:12:58 +0200 (EET) From: Catalin BOIE X-X-Sender: util@hosting.rdsbv.ro To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.6.0test9 + 2 * P IV Xeon 2.4GHz with HT + SATA + RAID1 = scheduler problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1064 Lines: 31 Hi! I want to tell you that 2.6.0-test gets better and better. It works very very well on several systems. Thank you very much, guys. I have an server (like in the subject). The problem is that the scheduler seems to behave weird. Sometimes a program just do nothing. There is no disk activity, interrupts are a little over 1000, no disk requests, context switches are ~40. The system is idle but it has work to do! Can I provide more info? I tried to put elevator=deadline and things seems worse. If I'm not mistaken, the processes are in D state. Bt I'm not sure, I must check again and right now I can't. Also I suspect that scheduler doesn't pay special attention to virtual (HT) processors. Is this true? I have not seen this problem on other machines. Thank you. --- Catalin(ux) BOIE catab@deuroconsult.ro - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/