Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:29:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:29:29 -0500 Received: from dfmail.f-secure.com ([194.252.6.39]:51978 "HELO dfmail.f-secure.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:28:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:37:16 +0200 (MET DST) From: Szabolcs Szakacsits To: Alan Cox cc: Guest section DW , Stephen Clouse , Rik van Riel , "Patrick O'Rourke" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > and rely on it. You might find you need a few Gbytes of swap just to > > > boot > > Seems a bit exaggeration ;) Here are numbers, > NetBSD is if I remember rightly still using a.out library styles. No, it uses ELF today, moreover the numbers were from Solaris. NetBSD also switched from non-overcommit to overcommit-only [AFAIK] mode with "random" process killing with its new UVM. > > 6-50% more VM and the performance hit also isn't so bad as it's thought > > (Eduardo Horvath sent a non-overcommit patch for Linux about one year > > ago). > The Linux performance hit would be so close to zero you shouldnt be able to > measure it - or it was in 1.2 anyway Yep, something like this :) Szaka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/