Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:24:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lxom.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.
Message-ID: <20180917122430.GA3320@kroah.com>
References: <20180917114852.hzo36b2fewdzqc4t@wunner.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180917114852.hzo36b2fewdzqc4t@wunner.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Seriously though, I read this to know what I need to be aware of but oddly
> the language of this paragraph says it doesn't apply to me:  I'm not using
> an official project e-mail address nor an official social media account,
> nor has anyone appointed me as representative.  I can live with that, I'm
> just wondering what the benefit of a document is that only seems to apply
> to a tiny fraction of the community.

I do not think you are reading the document correctly.  As an example,
it should cover any emails sent to this list.  That is not a "tiny
fraction" by my last count :)

thanks,

greg k-h