Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:15:28 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list
Message-ID: <20180917141528.GI3902@linux-r8p5>
References: <1536780532-4092-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
 <1536780532-4092-4-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1536780532-4092-4-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Waiman Long wrote:

>@@ -927,8 +921,6 @@ struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> 	struct inode *inode;
>
>-	spin_lock_prefetch(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);

I think we can get rid of the spin_lock_prefetch call altogether as this is the
only user left afaict.