Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:20:17 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc:     palmer@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        hch@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
        Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, anup@brainfault.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency
Message-ID: <20180917142017.GA15588@infradead.org>
References: <1536962096-233842-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com>
 <1536962096-233842-2-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1536962096-233842-2-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:54:54PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
> 
> Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly,
> because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place.  This
> corrects the issue, moving it from

Last time this was brought up we actually had realy life DTs with
the timebase-frequency under cpus and not the invidual cpu node.

I think we need to just document both possibilities and live with
them.