Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180911214737.GA81235@gmail.com> <CAHmME9rFUruF-VN1pmU-k5nFsb9ppAPhPpW-5Ho9dKL2HCg4kA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180911233015.GD11474@lunn.ch> <20180911.165739.2032677219588723041.davem@davemloft.net>
 <CALCETrXrJPcs3h9CtF50N4k2AGx3qzspJd_UW3t+KGYOj7+p=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9ohGPTX-fkhP6zaWdx3SbkiqO5kWkWE-bDk=pm-nUqYvw@mail.gmail.com> <8937D6B1-D21C-4C47-8A89-A466CDB6FB04@amacapital.net>
In-Reply-To: <8937D6B1-D21C-4C47-8A89-A466CDB6FB04@amacapital.net>
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 18:24:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHmME9pKGyATJQSnKCzmjn5rAUG6pNAAeuwwBr4TequweNd24Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/17] zinc: introduce minimal cryptography library
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:54 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> be nice, but if the authors of that assembly are convinced it should be replaced, then this step is optional IMO.

I think this actually makes the patchset and maintenance of it a lot
more confusing, so I'm going to abort doing this. I'd rather make the
convincing argument for the assembly anyway.