Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 044/126] f2fs: do not set free of current section
Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:41:32 +0200
Message-Id: <20180917211707.554836447@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180917211703.481236999@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180917211703.481236999@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 3611ce9911267cb93d364bd71ddea6821278d11f ]

For the case when sbi->segs_per_sec > 1, take section:segment = 5 for
example, if segment 1 is just used and allocate new segment 2, and the
blocks of segment 1 is invalidated, at this time, the previous code will
use __set_test_and_free to free the free_secmap and free_sections++,
this is not correct since it is still a current section, so fix it.

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.h |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ static inline void __set_test_and_free(s
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, free_i->free_segmap)) {
 		free_i->free_segments++;
 
+		if (IS_CURSEC(sbi, secno))
+			goto skip_free;
 		next = find_next_bit(free_i->free_segmap,
 				start_segno + sbi->segs_per_sec, start_segno);
 		if (next >= start_segno + sbi->segs_per_sec) {
@@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ static inline void __set_test_and_free(s
 				free_i->free_sections++;
 		}
 	}
+skip_free:
 	spin_unlock(&free_i->segmap_lock);
 }