Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:57:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:57:49 -0500 Received: from asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.84]:54726 "EHLO asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:57:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:56:12 +0100 From: Ingo Oeser To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Message-ID: <20010324005612.V11126@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> In-Reply-To: <20010323011140.A1176@werewolf.able.es> <20010323013800.A1918@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010323013800.A1918@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > Is there a non-written standard for coding that asm's ? > For example: > " adcl 12(%1), %0\n" > "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n" > " lea 4(%1), %1\n" > > or > > "adcl 12(%1), %0\n\t" ^[1] > "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n\t" > "lea 4(%1), %1\n\t" The first one is better readable and the latter one is more portable (since the first may contain tabs in the string, instead of spaces and no one sees this). You'll see, what I mean with readable, if you omit the tab in [1]. Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/