Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264530AbTKNQqt (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:46:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264532AbTKNQqt (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:46:49 -0500 Received: from ipcop.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.15]:44194 "EHLO work.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264530AbTKNQqr (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:46:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:46:40 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Andrew Walrond Cc: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air Message-ID: <20031114164640.GA1618@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Andrew Walrond , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200311132057.53026.andrew@walrond.org> <20031114150047.GC30711@work.bitmover.com> <200311141624.32108.andrew@walrond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311141624.32108.andrew@walrond.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1821 Lines: 50 On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:24:31PM +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote: > On Friday 14 Nov 2003 3:00 pm, Larry McVoy wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:57:53PM +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote: > > > The point. You got one major o/s project hosted on bk when you ought to > > > have them all. Loads more developers using bk at home means loads more > > > demanding it at work. > > > > > > And all it would take is a lobotomised, redistributable, license free > > > client so anyone can pull o/s software from bk repos. > > > > One of us is not getting it, maybe it's me. To build something like > > you describe is pretty easy IF AND ONLY IF all you are asking for is an > > update mechanism. As soon as you want revision history, diffs, rollbacks, > > modifiable files, etc., you have to go to real BK. Is that OK? All you > > want is a "keep me up to date" mechanism? No diffs, no history, it's a > > replacement for tarballs and patches? > > Yes exactly. Fundamentally I want *anybody*, without restriction, to ge able > to pull and update sources from any open-source project hosted with bk. > > The requirements are the equivalent functionality to: > > lobobk clone ... Sure. > lobobk -r co There are no local revision history files in lobobk, it's just a file transport. > lobobk pull Sure. > lobobk export -r tag dest That's lobobk clone -r tag FROM DEST And you of course realize that you as a BK user could code up this system with zero changes needed from us, right? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/