Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp407178imm; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaTPibd9Fz7c+XoXTbi5J6GJJIuhxN6/otABJ7WiqFBjyDUyvfhsbZwBPal8OPqvh4UigrU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6845:: with SMTP id f5-v6mr33400292pln.17.1537342258383; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537342258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JAMSrcevFcRTBcNSvYkZC5PmV1WUb3vMcu6I+Cjl0fsw0D4NJpUx16PcMRT01ha9YF G0kw0ywecyxXaSxHvxpMB+tCjO2g0z7aerVFkAhs8bFSi6IepNMCAtdRI5OJsTPyctVw V337nCsBA0IC9Tcu2rF5K/DRO3/X6jaaHZnm92xECTMOuVPfXXAL40b9+taNWNUeuX3Q qFpLXbZxCcvwRpTYzUN5Jp+FnaqfTGKiUrnhSfsbkoG3aoxfihCisZbmiNiORhgBUU3b ow930r4BwPRMSSrn9tXdfQalFhbTy6rXUS5M5cblNKI/WwMt3AHfKrzrFA3rhkso/7ZX I3ag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=qtzXqc6vvikYgy2tluUEYvN0YwqWXha8r+7jLkkO7BA=; b=Jxz1t2HWXi88b9W2jkgnJCfHaItZxSpsBXIeShfN7mM1FRbNJF2x4Xx+uARKx5hKje oyuRBWKVfNRPbDOd9lUAcowQAp5it+IpwT1izwqFybLZCy/lnSMPEf3bMmoNQRPoZG4f RvYqFuUoGpEZKtlI0g15cTtEQxF/aAEhIbdVsaj2S9T+sSBgf8wGbKSGEFKc0FxwiYH3 ykrhO/fFV2vUATfZPXJvlBwiAotpa+69ZnCFz+Haa776gqKrdEI6WSnIKbonXlVRUJ93 iRGUHa63hQ12Z6E8ep5xwU7PCoQprVG0tkhdkxLju+IzxUG/CmAetXlbhY5yTj12Tmh5 BTAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x32-v6si20605216pld.330.2018.09.19.00.30.42; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728297AbeISNHM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:07:12 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:20515 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725973AbeISNHL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:07:11 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2018 00:30:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,393,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="91367038" Received: from chenyu-desktop.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.116]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2018 00:30:31 -0700 From: Chen Yu To: Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Len Brown , Zhimin Gu , Yu Chen Subject: [PATCH 01/12][RFC v3] x86, hibernate: Fix nosave_regions setup for hibernation Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:37:15 +0800 Message-Id: <9df6959bc2f3776eb512b7964a94bd02639e65eb.1537275915.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Zhimin Gu On 32bit systems, nosave_regions(non RAM areas) located between max_low_pfn and max_pfn are not excluded from hibernation snapshot currently, which may result in a machine check exception when trying to access these unsafe regions during hibernation: [ 612.800453] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 612.805786] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: fe00000000801136 [ 612.814344] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 60:<00000000d90be566> {swsusp_save+0x436/0x560} [ 612.823167] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 1f5939fe276 ADDR dd000000 MISC 30e0000086 [ 612.830677] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306c3 TIME 1529487426 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 24 [ 612.839581] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii' [ 612.846394] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt [ 612.853380] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check [ 612.858978] Kernel Offset: 0x18000000 from 0xc1000000 (relocation range: 0xc0000000-0xf7ffdfff) This is because on 32bit systems, pages above max_low_pfn are regarded as high memeory, and accessing unsafe pages might cause expected MCE. On the problematic 32bit system, there are reserved memory above low memory, which triggered the MCE: e820 memory mapping: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009d7ff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009d800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000e0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000d160cfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d160d000-0x00000000d1613fff] ACPI NVS [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1614000-0x00000000d1a44fff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1a45000-0x00000000d1ecffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1ed0000-0x00000000d7eeafff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d7eeb000-0x00000000d7ffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8000000-0x00000000d875ffff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8760000-0x00000000d87fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8800000-0x00000000d8fadfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8fae000-0x00000000d8ffffff] ACPI data [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d9000000-0x00000000da71bfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000da71c000-0x00000000da7fffff] ACPI NVS [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000da800000-0x00000000dbb8bfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dbb8c000-0x00000000dbffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dd000000-0x00000000df1fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000f8000000-0x00000000fbffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec00000-0x00000000fec00fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed00000-0x00000000fed03fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed1ffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fee00000-0x00000000fee00fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ff000000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000041edfffff] usable Fix this problem by changing pfn limit from max_low_pfn to max_pfn. This fix does not impact 64bit system because on 64bit max_low_pfn is the same as max_pfn. Acked-by: Pavel Machek Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Zhimin Gu Signed-off-by: Chen Yu --- arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index b4866badb235..90ecc108bc8a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) x86_init.hyper.guest_late_init(); e820__reserve_resources(); - e820__register_nosave_regions(max_low_pfn); + e820__register_nosave_regions(max_pfn); x86_init.resources.reserve_resources(); -- 2.17.1