Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:46:39 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc:     Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Cleanups and
 optimizations
Message-ID: <20180919104639.6b5339e9@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <20180907164524.GH5662@atomide.com>
References: <20180813223448.21316-1-jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
        <20180820213904.13475-1-jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
        <20180905084757.432e7c19@xps13>
        <1855340.fVHtouTg44@z50>
        <20180907164524.GH5662@atomide.com>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Janusz,

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:45:24
-0700:

> Hi,
> 
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> [180905 20:56]:
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:47:57 AM CEST Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > > Patch 2/3 does not apply on nand/next. Indeed the driver does not look
> > > the same as in the diff.  
> > 
> > That's because I built it on top of my former series from the mid of July, 
> > containing "[PATCH v2 2/3 v4] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup table". 
> > It was acked by you, Miquel, and supposed to be merged via linux-omap tree.  
> 
> Hmm I thought the plan was for dependencies to clear and then
> merge the rest via various driver trees.. Or at least I don't have
> the patch above tagged anywhere for me to merge. Then again, I
> try to forget everything posted before -rc1 just to stay sane :)
> 
> > > I don't see any changes on my side that could
> > > explain this so perhaps you could rebase on top of 4.19-rc2 (or
> > > nand/next, as you wish) and resend the series?  
> > 
> > As far as I can see, Tony hasn't applied that series yet, so maybe I can still 
> > move that patch out of there and insert it into this series in front of the 
> > other 3 patches and resend. That would however make patch 3/3 of that old 
> > series depend on this one.
> > 
> > Tony, what do you think?  
> 
> Yes please resend based on v4.19-rc1 or MTD next. If there
> are still pending dependencies, please let us know and we can
> set up an immutable branch against v4.19-rc1 with those for
> MTD and me to merge in as needed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

AFAIR I didn't received any new patches from you since Tony suggestion.
If you haven't done it already, please rebase against nand/next before
sending patches (internal API changed a bit, it might be worth fixing
the conflicts before sending them).


Thanks,
Miquèl