Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180919211458.GA8757@kroah.com>
References: <20180918165542.4691-1-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
 <20180918165542.4691-3-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20180918173428.GA21591@kroah.com>
 <CANiq72=ZU61EaoWm2N4G1SZF0QUvzquULo50uEvDRU-hitOJVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180919211458.GA8757@kroah.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:00:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72kS_w7p3Xe9cDCjCA9j1u-zQ1-C4ZX7N8G+AbP4u7SG8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:56:04PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>
>> Since Linus/Andrew/you
>> didn't comment on whether you wanted or not this for 4.19, we are
>> assuming they would go in for 4.20. However, Stefan/Nick/... wanted
>> this for 4.19 instead, they asked me to extract these patches two
>> separately for 4.19. I let them comment further on the status of Clang
>> on arm32.
>
> If these do not fix a regression, I don't see how they would be ready
> for 4.19-final.

Ok, I will wait a bit to send v5 until this is sorted out.

[CC'd Nick, Stefan, Arnd: I just noticed the Reviewed-by/... lines
were not picked as CC].

>
>> I am going to send a v5 of the entire series without these two
>> patches, based on -rc4 (or -next, which one do you prefer? I would say
>> these patches should be applied early in the -next branches, so that
>> everyone is ready for the change, given it "touches" every translation
>> unit).
>
> That's up to whomever takes these into their tree for linux-next
> inclusion.  If you are about to break everything, then you might
> consider changing your patches so they do not do that :)
>

Well, the series shouldn't break anything (famous last words :), even
if everyone includes those headers. So, in theory, they *could* be
applied anywhere, anytime; but given they are global changes...

Cheers,
Miguel